Kreativfyul
Sample loan review screen with document checks. Personal data is masked.
ProductCustom apps

Canada loan platform

Applications, documents, and a human decision

A loan operations platform for a Canadian client, with document intake, bank connectivity, phone menus, and review workflows.

  • 7 mo

    Core platform in production use

  • Human

    Final credit decision

  • Canada

    AWS ca-central-1

Client names, logos, and contracts stay unpublished under NDA. Software screens use sample data, not live records.

Outcome focus

4 connections

Bank verification, bank API, phone menu, document intake

Explore custom apps

01 — Context

Challenge

Applications, identity documents, bank verification, and phone follow-up lived in different tools. Reviewers rebuilt the file before they could decide.

02 — Method

Approach

Laravel holds the application. Applicants upload identity and income documents. OCR reads them into fields a reviewer checks. Flinks handles bank-account verification. A BMO API integration covers the payment status the client needed. A Twilio phone menu handles status calls and callbacks. AI prepares a checklist. A person approves or sends the file back. The lender is not named.

Workflow

  1. Apply

    The applicant submits the form and the required documents.

  2. Verify

    OCR fills fields, Flinks confirms the account, and the phone menu can request a callback.

  3. Decide

    A reviewer uses the checklist and approves, declines, or sends the file back.

Outcomes

  • The review screen shows document, bank, and call status together
  • Extracted fields stay editable. The source file stays attached.
  • AI output is a checklist, not a credit decision

Measurement

Illustrative patterns from this engagement style

Files opened with documents already attached

Illustrative share of reviews that started with identity and income files on the application.

M1M2M3M4M6M7
  • 16 M1
  • 29 M2
  • 44 M3
  • 61 M4
  • 73 M6
  • 80 M7

Checkpoint values

Same series as bars — useful for scanning week-to-week movement.

Reviewer time on a file

Illustrative. Decisions stayed manual.

Before

  • Collect documents45%
  • Re-key fields30%
  • Decide25%

After we rebalance

  • Collect documents15%
  • Re-key fields15%
  • Decide70%

Charts are illustrative patterns for how we sequence and measure work in this category. They are not audited financial results or guarantees.

Visuals

Project gallery

Forms and listings are sample interfaces. They are not screenshots of a client's live data.

Sample application review with verification checks
Sample application review with verification checks
Operations notes beside a review queue
Operations notes beside a review queue

Need a similar outcome?

Book a free audit. We will tell you whether a campaign rebuild, a product build, or a creative system is the honest next step.

Book a free audit